Decoding Bigfoot Prints: Real Evidence or Myth?

The mystery of Bigfoot has captivated imaginations for decades, with purported eyewitness accounts and intriguing, yet often debated, physical evidence fueling the legend. Among this evidence, Bigfoot Prints stand out as tangible clues that seem to offer a direct link to the elusive creature. But how closely do these footprints bring us to the truth?

Enthusiasm often surges with discoveries like the Skookum body cast, initially interpreted by some as a hominid impression. However, upon closer inspection, alternative explanations frequently emerge. In the case of the Skookum cast, the compelling evidence points towards a more mundane origin: an elk. Elk tracks found directly on the cast itself lend considerable weight to this interpretation. For skeptics and researchers alike, such readily available natural explanations become the default conclusion when analyzing purported bigfoot prints.

This isn’t to dismiss the enduring allure of Bigfoot. The phenomenon continues to fascinate, and the sheer volume of eyewitness stories is undeniably compelling. Many, including myself, find it difficult to entirely disregard these accounts. Yet, the challenge remains: moving beyond anecdotal evidence to verifiable material proof. To date, the physical evidence presented, particularly concerning bigfoot prints, remains either unconvincing or fraught with interpretational problems. The Skookum cast serves as a stark reminder of how easily misidentification and wishful thinking can influence our perception of evidence.

Perhaps the definitive proof of Bigfoot’s existence remains elusive. Maybe, as some speculate, personal encounter is the only path to genuine conviction. Until then, the scientific community and skeptical enthusiasts will likely continue to scrutinize claims, analyze bigfoot prints, and seek explanations rooted in the known natural world. The search for Bigfoot goes on, fueled by wonder and tempered by the need for robust evidence.

References

• Bindernagel, J. A. 1998. North America’s Great Ape: the Sasquatch. Beachcomber Books, Courtenay, B.C.
• Conway, J., Kosemen, C. M. & Naish, D. 2013. Cryptozoologicon Volume I. Irregular Books.
• Edwards, C. J. & Barnett, R. 2015. Himalayan ‘yeti’ DNA: polar bear or DNA degradation? A comment on ‘Genetic analysis of hair samples attributed to yeti’ by Sykes et al. (2014). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282, 20141712.
• Gutiérrez, E. E. & Pine, R. H. 2015. No need to replace an “anomalous” primate (Primates) with an “anomalous” bear (Carnivora, Ursidae). ZooKeys 487: 141-154.
• Ketchum, M. S., Wojkiewicz, P. W., Watts, A. B., Spence, D. W., Holzenburg, A. K., Toler, d. G., Prychitko, T. M., Zhang, F., Bollinger, S., Shoulders, R. & Smith, R. 2013. Novel North American mominins, next generation sequencing of three whole genomes and associated studies. DeNovo – Accelerated Science, Special Issue 2-12-2013.
• Krantz, G. S. 1999. Bigfoot Sasquatch Evidence. Hancock House, Surrey, B.C. & Blaine, WA.
• Loxton, D. & Prothero, D. R. 2013. Abominable Science! Columbia University Press, New York.
• Lu, Z., Meldrum, D. J., Huang, Y. & Sarmiento, E. 2011. The Jinniushan hominin pedal skeleton from the late Middle Pleistocene of China. Homo: internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen 62, 389-401.
• MacPhee, R. D. E. & Meldrum, J. 2006. Postcranial remains of the extinct monkeys of the Greater Antilles, with evidence for semiterrestriality in Paralouatta. American Museum Novitates 3516, 1-65.
• Meldrum, D. J. 1990. New fossil platyrrhine tali from the early Miocene of Argentina. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 83, 403-418.
• Meldrum, D. J., Fleagle, J. G. & Kay, R. F. 1990. Partial humeri of two Miocene Colombian primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 81, 413-422.
• Meldrum, D. J., Lockley, M. G., Lucas, S. G. & Musiba, C. M. 1992. Ichnotaxonomy of the Laetoli trackways: the earliest hominin footprints. Journal of African Earth Sciences 60, 1-12.
• Meldrum, D. J. 2004. Midfoot flexibility, fossil footprints, and sasquatch steps: new perspectives on the evolution of bipedalism. Journal of Scientific Exploration 18, 65-79.
• Meldrum, D. J. 2006. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. Tom Doherty Associates, New York.
• Meldrum, J. 1993. Postcranial adaptations and positional behavior in fossil platyrrhines. In Gebo, D. L. (ed) Postcranial Adaptation in Nonhuman Primates. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, pp. 235-251.
• Naish, D. 2017. Hunting Monsters. Arcturus Books, London.
• Regal, B. 2009. Entering dubious realms: Grover Krantz, science, and sasquatch. Annals of Science 66, 83-102.
• Sarmiento, E. & Meldrum, D. J. 2011. Behavioral and phylogenetic implications of a narrow allometric study of Ardipithecus ramidus. Homo: internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen 62, 75-108.
• Sykes, B. C., Mullis, R. A., Hagenmuller, C., Melton, T. W. & Sartori, M. 2014. Genetic analysis of hair samples attributed to yeti, bigfoot and other anomalous primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281, 20140161.